97 Right to intervene in automated decision-making
Data Protection Act 2018 (2018 c 12) | Legislation

97  Right to intervene in automated decision-making

(1)     This section applies where—

(a)     the controller takes a decision significantly affecting a data subject that is based solely on automated processing of personal data relating to the data subject, and

(b)     the decision is required or authorised by law.

(2)     This section does not apply to such a decision if—

(a)     the data subject has

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

HCPC—Main hearing of the Health and Care Professions Tribunal

HCPC—Main hearing of the Health and Care Professions TribunalCoronavirus (COVID-19): This Practice Note contains guidance on subjects impacted by the government’s response to the coronavirus outbreak. In particular, the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Rules Order

LEXISNEXIS

Unless orders

Unless ordersThis Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.This Practice Note provides guidance on

LEXISNEXIS

Strict liability

Strict liabilityStrict liabilityWhen an offence does not require proof of a mental element it is an offence of strict liability. There are some common law offences of strict liability (eg public nuisance, outraging public decency and contempt) most though are statutory, arising often under

LEXISNEXIS

Nuisance and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher—common law liability for pollution

Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not