Part 9 Alteration of Penalties for Summary Offences
Criminal Justice Act 2003 (2003 c 44) | Legislation

Part 9 Alteration of Penalties for Summary Offences

Short title and chapterExtent of repeal
Vagrancy Act 1824 (c 83)Section 5.
Section 10.
Railway Regulation Act 1842 (c 55)In section 17, the words from “be imprisoned” (where first occurring) to “discretion of such justice, shall”.
London Hackney Carriages Act 1843 (c 86)In section 28, the words from “; or it shall be lawful” to the end.
Town Police Clauses Act 1847 (c 89)In section 28, the words from “, or, in the discretion” to “fourteen days”.
In section 29, the words from “, or, in the discretion” to the end.In section 36, the words from “, or, in the discretion” to “one month”.
Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act 1860 (c 32)In section 2, the words from “, or may, if the justices” to the end.
Town Gardens Protection Act 1863 (c 13)In section 5, the words “, or to imprisonment for any period not exceeding fourteen days”.
Public Stores Act 1875 (c 25)In section 8, the words from “, or, in the discretion” to the end.
North Sea Fisheries Act 1893 (c 17)In section 2—
(a)
Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Recklessness in criminal cases

Recklessness in criminal casesWhat is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House

LEXISNEXIS

Strict liability

Strict liabilityStrict liabilityWhen an offence does not require proof of a mental element it is an offence of strict liability. There are some common law offences of strict liability (eg public nuisance, outraging public decency and contempt) most though are statutory, arising often under

LEXISNEXIS

Fraud by false representation

Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the

LEXISNEXIS

Resulting trusts

Resulting trusts represent one of the three types of trust which do not require to be declared or evidenced in writing. The others are constructive and implied trusts, although it is perhaps doubtful whether there is any form of implied trust which is not in fact either a resulting trust or a