264 Consecutive terms
Criminal Justice Act 2003 (2003 c 44) | Legislation

264  Consecutive terms

(1)     This section applies where—

(a)     a person (“the offender”) has been sentenced to two or more terms of imprisonment which are to be served consecutively on each other, and

(b)     the sentences were passed on the same occasion or, where they were passed on different occasions, the person has not been released under this Chapter at any time during the period beginning with the first and ending with the last of those occasions[. . .

(c)     . . .].

[(2A)     Subsection (2B) applies if each of the terms of imprisonment is subject to initial automatic release.

(2B)     Nothing in this Chapter requires the Secretary of State to release the offender until the offender has served a period equal to the aggregate of the length of the minimum custodial periods in each of the terms.

(2C)     Subsections (2D) and (2E) apply if at least one of the terms of imprisonment is subject to initial Parole Board referral.

(2D)     Nothing in this Chapter requires the Secretary of State to refer the offender's case to the Board until the offender has served a period equal to the aggregate length of the minimum custodial periods in each of the terms.

(2E)     Nothing in

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Proprietary estoppel

Proprietary estoppelThis Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice

LEXISNEXIS

The Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)

The Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)OverviewThe requirements to have robust systems and controls in a regulated firm to prevent money laundering originate from:•the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, SI 2017/692 (as

LEXISNEXIS

Fraud by false representation

Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the

LEXISNEXIS

Resulting trusts

Resulting trusts represent one of the three types of trust which do not require to be declared or evidenced in writing. The others are constructive and implied trusts, although it is perhaps doubtful whether there is any form of implied trust which is not in fact either a resulting trust or a