519 Statement by auditor to be [sent to] company
Companies Act 2006 (2006 c 46) | Legislation

Statement by auditor on ceasing to hold office

519  Statement by auditor to be [sent to] company

[(1)     An auditor of a public interest company who is ceasing to hold office (at any time and for any reason) must send to the company a statement of the reasons for doing so.

(2)     An auditor (“A”) of a non-public interest company who is ceasing to hold office must send to the company a statement of the reasons for doing so unless A satisfies the first or second condition.

(2A)     The first condition is that A is ceasing to hold office—

(a)     in the case of a private company, at the end of a period for appointing auditors;

(b)     in the case of a public company, at the end of an accounts meeting.

(2B)

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Serving outside the jurisdiction with court permission—application and order

This Practice Note addresses issues when serving out of the jurisdiction and the permission of the court is required. It explains how to make an application and the form of order required. An application to serve out of the jurisdiction is generally made without notice and on the papers. Key

LEXISNEXIS

The Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)

The Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)OverviewThe requirements to have robust systems and controls in a regulated firm to prevent money laundering originate from:•the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, SI 2017/692 (as

LEXISNEXIS

Grounds of appeal—introducing new evidence

Grounds of appeal—introducing new evidenceCoronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The

LEXISNEXIS

Fraud by false representation

Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the